On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Ed Schouten wrote:
> 2016-05-27 8:50 GMT+02:00 Conrad Meyer :
>> There's nothing to support — literally ignoring the keyword is an
>> acceptable implementation. So it's disappointing C++ chooses to
>> reject C keywords.
>
> Keep in mind that C++ does not reject "s
There's nothing to support — literally ignoring the keyword is an
acceptable implementation. So it's disappointing C++ chooses to
reject C keywords.
My take is that C++ programs shouldn't be including sys/md5.h directly
at all. That's the kernel's header. If they want to use md5, they go
throug
2016-05-27 8:50 GMT+02:00 Conrad Meyer :
> There's nothing to support — literally ignoring the keyword is an
> acceptable implementation. So it's disappointing C++ chooses to
> reject C keywords.
Keep in mind that C++ does not reject "static" altogether; only in
this specific context. The reason
Hi Conrad,
2016-05-27 7:31 GMT+02:00 Conrad E. Meyer :
> libmd: Work around C++'s inability to understand C
So C++ doesn't support using 'static' within array types, right? What
I personally dislike about this specific change:
- Including directly still doesn't work.
- If is ever going to in
Author: cem
Date: Fri May 27 05:31:14 2016
New Revision: 300824
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300824
Log:
libmd: Work around C++'s inability to understand C
Reported by: antoine@ (x265)
Modified:
head/lib/libmd/md5.h
Modified: head/lib/libmd/md5.h
=
