On Mar 4, 2015 6:59 AM, "Justin T. Gibbs" wrote:
>
> Would "--non-interactive" be a better name for this option? Or maybe
there is a standard option name used by other utilities to disable the TTY
check?
cperciva@ had a few reasons for recommending the flag name:
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D155
On Mar 3, 2015, at 4:20 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
>
> Author: allanjude (doc committer)
> Date: Tue Mar 3 23:20:18 2015
> New Revision: 279571
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279571
>
> Log:
> Add a new safetly belt to freebsd-update to prevent a user doing a minor
> update (-pX)
Allan,
Ahmed Kamal is working on helping
with devops automation of some of the config management associated
with the jenkins.freebsd.org cluster. Ahmed pointed out to me
that this enhancement to freebsd-update would facilitate using
freebsd-update in an automation environment.
Allan, thanks for
Author: allanjude (doc committer)
Date: Tue Mar 3 23:20:18 2015
New Revision: 279571
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/279571
Log:
Add a new safetly belt to freebsd-update to prevent a user doing a minor
update (-pX) while having an unfinished major upgrade (9.x to 9.y)
Safetly
