Adrian Chadd wrote this message on Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:43 -0800:
> When I've done what you're doing, I end up having these options in my
> minimal config file so opt_xxx.h is correctly populated. That way when
> I point SYSDIR (or whichever variable it is) at the configured kernel
> directory w
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:23:03PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> I think defining UFS options in kernel connfig affect to module too.
> When I define this options in kernel config (w/o options FFS) I got
> ufs.ko with this SU, quota, acl etc.
Nice point I missed in earlier replies. In my sta
Among emails in this thread, Warner Losh wrote:
[ so to avoid replying on per-email bases ]
> (2) is the exact problem I'm working on. Since the design of that will
> allow us to read from the kernel these modules, (1) becomes largely
> irrelevant because the only /boot/loader incursion would be to
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:57:54AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> >> Author: imp
> >> Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
> >> New Revision: 277204
> >> URL: https://sv
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> On 16 January 2015 at 10:48, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>
>> Options aren’t supposed to change KBI. Some do, and that’s unfortunate.
>
> Yup, and at least for net80211 I'm going to try really hard to fix that.
>
>> But don’t turn this into a
On 16 January 2015 at 10:48, Warner Losh wrote:
> Options aren’t supposed to change KBI. Some do, and that’s unfortunate.
Yup, and at least for net80211 I'm going to try really hard to fix that.
> But don’t turn this into a rant on how sub-optimal the opt_.h
> intersect with modules. That’
> On Jan 16, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
> On 16 January 2015 at 09:57, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
>>>
Author: imp
Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
On 16 January 2015 at 09:57, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>> On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
>>
>>> Author: imp
>>> Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
>>> New Revision: 277204
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changes
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:51:55AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> +# Pseudo devices.
>>> +device loop# Network loopback
>>> +device random # Entropy device
>>> +devic
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:44 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:23:03PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
>>> New Revision: 277204
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> New
> On Jan 15, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>> Author: imp
>> Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
>> New Revision: 277204
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
>>
>> Log:
>> New MINIMAL kernel config
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:51:55AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > [...]
> > +# Pseudo devices.
> > +device loop# Network loopback
> > +device random # Entropy device
> > +device padlock_rng # VIA Padlock RNG
> > +d
On 1/14/15 7:42 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> Author: imp
> Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
> New Revision: 277204
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
>
> Log:
> New MINIMAL kernel config. The goal with this configuration is to
> only compile in those options in GENERIC that cann
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 05:35:41PM +0300, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> On 15.01.2015 17:08, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > When you read one big file *once* you don't have to worry about caching
> > reads. With everything moved to modules, loader does a lot of
> > superfluous disk access, and to remedy
On 15.01.2015 17:08, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> reading large monolitic kernel is slow too.
>
> But not nearly as slow as loading 50-60 modules at boot time (on my stable/8
> I have 59 right now). When you read one big file *once* you don't have to
> worry about caching reads. With everything mo
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:53:42PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:44:46PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > intention. AFAIR last time we had a discussion about why our default
> > kernel is not MINIMAL, it boiled down to two main problems: 1) loader's
> > caching o
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 01:44:46PM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:23:03PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > New Revision: 277204
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
> > >
> >
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 04:23:03PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
> > New Revision: 277204
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
> >
> > Log:
> > New MINIMAL kernel config. The goal with this configuration is to
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 12:42:07AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
> Author: imp
> Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
> New Revision: 277204
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
>
> Log:
> New MINIMAL kernel config. The goal with this configuration is to
> only compile in those optio
Author: imp
Date: Thu Jan 15 00:42:06 2015
New Revision: 277204
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/277204
Log:
New MINIMAL kernel config. The goal with this configuration is to
only compile in those options in GENERIC that cannot be loaded as
modules. ufs is still included becaus
20 matches
Mail list logo
