I’ll back them out in one commit, and commit the fix in the next, so there
will be a one commit window.
Warner
> On Jan 2, 2015, at 9:23 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> Sure, I don't have any problem with backing this out for now. For clang
> 3.5.0 users, it should not matter too much that GNU
Sure, I don't have any problem with backing this out for now. For clang
3.5.0 users, it should not matter too much that GNU as is run for just a
few files.
-Dimitry
> On 03 Jan 2015, at 05:14, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> Conditioning on the compiler version is actually rather easy,
> especially sin
Conditioning on the compiler version is actually rather easy,
especially since the number of affected files is so small.
It’s an issue when people build the old way on old systems, which
is still a lot more popular than you might think. MFC has nothing
to do with the problem. Over the years we’ve f
Hm, conditionalizing this on the compiler version is rather ugly. Isn't
this only relevant when we do an MFC? But maybe it is indeed better
to have the same Makefile for different toolchain envronments.
-Dimitry
> On 02 Jan 2015, at 18:33, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> This breaks building the kerne
This breaks building the kernel with clang 3.4.1
Warner
> On Jan 1, 2015, at 3:07 AM, Roman Divacky wrote:
>
> Author: rdivacky
> Date: Thu Jan 1 10:07:57 2015
> New Revision: 276499
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/276499
>
> Log:
> LLVM integrated assembler can assemble th
Author: rdivacky
Date: Thu Jan 1 10:07:57 2015
New Revision: 276499
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/276499
Log:
LLVM integrated assembler can assemble these files just fine.
Modified:
head/sys/conf/Makefile.amd64
head/sys/conf/Makefile.i386
head/sys/conf/Makefile.pc98
Mod