Mateusz Guzik writes:
> Baptiste Daroussin writes:
> > +static sig_atomic_t sig_chld = 0;
> > +static sig_atomic_t sig_term = 0;
> > +static sig_atomic_t sig_alrm = 0;
> > +static sig_atomic_t sig_ign = 0;
> No reason to se these explicitely to 0.
They do however need to be volatile.
DES
--
Da
On 16 July 2014 13:55, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Author: bapt
> Date: Wed Jul 16 09:55:36 2014
> New Revision: 268745
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268745
>
> Log:
> New BSDL timeout(1) utility compatible with GNU timeout
[...]
(sorry, missed this in a previous reply)
> Adde
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:55:36AM +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Author: bapt
> Date: Wed Jul 16 09:55:36 2014
> New Revision: 268745
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268745
>
> Log:
> New BSDL timeout(1) utility compatible with GNU timeout
The purpose of this utility is unc
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 01:29:14PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:45:12PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:34:11PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:29:08PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:55:36AM +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
> +#include
Is this header needed ?
The headers are unordered.
> +#include
> +#includ
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:45:12PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:34:11PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:29:08PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:55:36AM +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > > +static void
> >
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:34:11PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:29:08PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:55:36AM +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > +static void
> > > +usage(void)
> > > +{
> > > + fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s [--signal si
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:29:08PM +0200, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:55:36AM +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Author: bapt
> > Date: Wed Jul 16 09:55:36 2014
> > New Revision: 268745
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268745
> >
> > Log:
> > New BSDL tim
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 12:25:33PM +0200, Jan Beich wrote:
> Baptiste Daroussin writes:
>
> > Author: bapt
> > Date: Wed Jul 16 09:55:36 2014
> > New Revision: 268745
> > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268745
> >
> > Log:
> > New BSDL timeout(1) utility compatible with GNU timeou
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 09:55:36AM +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Author: bapt
> Date: Wed Jul 16 09:55:36 2014
> New Revision: 268745
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268745
>
> Log:
> New BSDL timeout(1) utility compatible with GNU timeout
>
> it fully passes the GNU ti
Baptiste Daroussin writes:
> Author: bapt
> Date: Wed Jul 16 09:55:36 2014
> New Revision: 268745
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268745
>
> Log:
> New BSDL timeout(1) utility compatible with GNU timeout
>
> it fully passes the GNU timeout regression tests, it is written in
Author: bapt
Date: Wed Jul 16 09:55:36 2014
New Revision: 268745
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268745
Log:
New BSDL timeout(1) utility compatible with GNU timeout
it fully passes the GNU timeout regression tests, it is written in a mostly
portable way (only signal parsing
12 matches
Mail list logo