On Jun 4, 2014, at 9:18 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 6/4/14, 11:19 PM, Drewery, Bryan wrote:
>> On 6/4/14, 2:26 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> On 2 June 2014 23:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> It would be nice if we could put that code back into make, but have
> it disabled. There are several people that use custom old trees that are
> hitting this when they build on newer systems... While /usr/ports is ready,
> forks of it might no
On Wed Jun 4 22:18:38 2014, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 6/4/14, 11:19 PM, Drewery, Bryan wrote:
On 6/4/14, 2:26 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 2 June 2014 23:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500, Bryan Dr
On 6/4/14, 11:19 PM, Drewery, Bryan wrote:
On 6/4/14, 2:26 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 2 June 2014 23:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500, Bryan Drewery writes:
Not sure if anyone cares, but this cha
On Jun 3, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500, Bryan Drewery writes:
>>> Not sure if anyone cares, but this change breaks all ports tree
>>> checkouts from before 2014-05-05 on s
On 6/4/14, 2:26 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 2 June 2014 23:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500, Bryan Drewery writes:
Not sure if anyone cares, but this change breaks all ports tree
checkouts from bef
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 12:26:07AM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 2 June 2014 23:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500, Bryan Drewery writes:
> >> >Not sure if anyone cares, but this change br
On 2 June 2014 23:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500, Bryan Drewery writes:
>> >Not sure if anyone cares, but this change breaks all ports tree
>> >checkouts from before 2014-05-05 on src head wi
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 09:46:38PM -0700, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500, Bryan Drewery writes:
> >Not sure if anyone cares, but this change breaks all ports tree
> >checkouts from before 2014-05-05 on src head with this revision.
>
> Yes, an older ports tree would
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500, Bryan Drewery writes:
>Not sure if anyone cares, but this change breaks all ports tree
>checkouts from before 2014-05-05 on src head with this revision.
Yes, an older ports tree would need an older bmake (or fmake).
Are we saying ports is *not* ready for that h
On 5/27/2014 1:39 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote:
> Author: sjg
> Date: Tue May 27 18:39:13 2014
> New Revision: 266760
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266760
>
> Log:
> Portmgr no longer need the UL hack.
>
> Reviewed by: obrien
>
> Modified:
> head/contrib/bmake/var.c
>
N
Author: sjg
Date: Tue May 27 18:39:13 2014
New Revision: 266760
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/266760
Log:
Portmgr no longer need the UL hack.
Reviewed by: obrien
Modified:
head/contrib/bmake/var.c
Modified: head/contrib/bmake/var.c
===
12 matches
Mail list logo
