On 31 October 2013 20:22, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Andre Oppermann wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 23:41 +0100:
>> >I know of only one modern ARM SoC that's able to DMA network packets on
>> >a 2-byte boundary (actually even it requires a 4-byte boundary, but it's
>> >willing to stuff
Andre Oppermann wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 23:41 +0100:
> >I know of only one modern ARM SoC that's able to DMA network packets on
> >a 2-byte boundary (actually even it requires a 4-byte boundary, but it's
> >willing to stuff the first 16 bits with zeroes and offset everything
> >t
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 23:41 +0100:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:14:57PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 22:13 +0100:
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:49:16PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > > Luigi Rizzo
On 31.10.2013 23:32, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 23:17 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 31.10.2013 20:27, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 20:08 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 31.10.2013 19:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann w
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:14:57PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 22:13 +0100:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:49:16PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > > Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 21:05 +0100:
> > > > On Thu, Oct
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 23:17 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 31.10.2013 20:27, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 20:08 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >> On 31.10.2013 19:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Author: andre
>
On 31.10.2013 21:15, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 21:05 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
Is there any chance all this reworking might get us to a position where
the protocol header in an mbuf doesn't have to be 32-bit aligned
a
On 31.10.2013 20:27, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 20:08 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On 31.10.2013 19:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Author: andre
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:46:10 2013
New Revision: 257455
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 22:13 +0100:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:49:16PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 21:05 +0100:
> > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > Is ther
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:49:16PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 21:05 +0100:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > ...
> > > Is there any chance all this reworking might get us to a position where
> > > the pro
Luigi Rizzo wrote this message on Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 21:05 +0100:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> ...
> > Is there any chance all this reworking might get us to a position where
> > the protocol header in an mbuf doesn't have to be 32-bit aligned
> > anymore? We p
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 21:05 +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> ...
> > Is there any chance all this reworking might get us to a position where
> > the protocol header in an mbuf doesn't have to be 32-bit aligned
> > anymore? We pay a pretty he
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:27:25PM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
...
> Is there any chance all this reworking might get us to a position where
> the protocol header in an mbuf doesn't have to be 32-bit aligned
> anymore? We pay a pretty heavy price for that requirement in the
> drivers of the least cap
On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 20:08 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> On 31.10.2013 19:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >> Author: andre
> >> Date: Thu Oct 31 15:46:10 2013
> >> New Revision: 257455
> >> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/bas
On 31.10.2013 19:03, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Author: andre
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:46:10 2013
New Revision: 257455
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/257455
Log:
Make struct ifnet readable and comprehensible again by grouping
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:46:10PM +, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Author: andre
> Date: Thu Oct 31 15:46:10 2013
> New Revision: 257455
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/257455
>
> Log:
> Make struct ifnet readable and comprehensible again by grouping
> and ordering related vari
Author: andre
Date: Thu Oct 31 15:46:10 2013
New Revision: 257455
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/257455
Log:
Make struct ifnet readable and comprehensible again by grouping
and ordering related variables, fields and locks next to each
other. Add more comments to variables.
17 matches
Mail list logo