On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Mark Johnston wrote:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:21:28AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Mark Johnston wrote:
Log:
Revert r257248 and fix the problem in a way that doesn't violate style(9).
Why did gcc complain about the original version?
It looks like
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 12:21:28AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Mark Johnston wrote:
>
> > Log:
> > Revert r257248 and fix the problem in a way that doesn't violate style(9).
>
> Why did gcc complain about the original version?
It looks like this is because of the use of -W,
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Mark Johnston wrote:
Log:
Revert r257248 and fix the problem in a way that doesn't violate style(9).
Why did gcc complain about the original version?
Modified: head/lib/libproc/_libproc.h
==
---
Author: markj
Date: Tue Oct 29 03:12:31 2013
New Revision: 257298
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/257298
Log:
Revert r257248 and fix the problem in a way that doesn't violate style(9).
Suggested by: jmg
Modified:
head/lib/libproc/_libproc.h
head/lib/libproc/proc_util.c
M
