on 28/01/2013 16:54 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Saturday, January 26, 2013 5:11:24 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 24/01/2013 00:52 Marius Strobl said the following:
>>> This is due to
>>> the fact that on sparc64, spinlock_enter() only raises the PIL but doesn't
>>> disable interrupts c
On Saturday, January 26, 2013 5:11:24 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 24/01/2013 00:52 Marius Strobl said the following:
> > This is due to
> > the fact that on sparc64, spinlock_enter() only raises the PIL but doesn't
> > disable interrupts completely.
>
> John,
>
> I wonder if you are consideri
on 24/01/2013 00:52 Marius Strobl said the following:
> This is due to
> the fact that on sparc64, spinlock_enter() only raises the PIL but doesn't
> disable interrupts completely.
John,
I wonder if you are considering pushing your amd64 TPR patch some day...
--
Andriy Gapon
___
Author: marius
Date: Wed Jan 23 22:52:20 2013
New Revision: 245850
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/245850
Log:
Revert the part of r239864 which removed obtaining the SMP mutex around
reading registers from other CPUs. As it turns out, the hardware doesn't
really like concurrent
