On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Juli Mallett wrote:
> The name of the protocol is certainly CVSup and not csup. And the
> protocol is what is being referred to here (as is suggested by the
> parenthetical.) If the protocol weren't being referred to, it would
> be a literal "cvsup" since that's
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 11:25, Eitan Adler wrote:
> Author: eadler
> Date: Sat Mar 24 18:25:16 2012
> New Revision: 233428
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/233428
>
> Log:
> Direct users to csup instead of cvsup in the csup-file boilerplate text.
Thanks for doing this! I'm not sure
Author: eadler
Date: Sat Mar 24 18:25:16 2012
New Revision: 233428
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/233428
Log:
Direct users to csup instead of cvsup in the csup-file boilerplate text.
Reviewed by: maxim, des, swills
Approved by: cperciva
MFC after:3 days
Modified:
he
