Re: svn commit: r232473 - in head: share/mk sys/conf

2012-03-03 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 3 Mar 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote: After r232322, it turned out many people (and some ports) are building kernel modules using their old installed /usr/share/mk/bsd.*.mk files, instead of the updated ones in their source tree. This leads to errors like: It is a bug for sys to depen

Re: svn commit: r232473 - in head: share/mk sys/conf

2012-03-03 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-03-03 21:03, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/03/2012 10:58, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> However, since it is apparently an expected use case to build using old >> .mk files, > > Expected how? It shouldn't happen if you're building in /usr/src. No, but it apparently happens if you build kernel m

Re: svn commit: r232473 - in head: share/mk sys/conf

2012-03-03 Thread Chris Rees
On 3 March 2012 20:03, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/03/2012 10:58, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> However, since it is apparently an expected use case to build using old >>   .mk files, > > Expected how? It shouldn't happen if you're building in /usr/src. > Wouldn't it be better to track down the real bug

Re: svn commit: r232473 - in head: share/mk sys/conf

2012-03-03 Thread Doug Barton
On 03/03/2012 12:05, Ben Kaduk wrote: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 03/03/2012 10:58, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> However, since it is apparently an expected use case to build using old >>> .mk files, >> >> Expected how? It shouldn't happen if you're building in /usr/s

Re: svn commit: r232473 - in head: share/mk sys/conf

2012-03-03 Thread Ben Kaduk
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > On 03/03/2012 10:58, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> However, since it is apparently an expected use case to build using old >>   .mk files, > > Expected how? It shouldn't happen if you're building in /usr/src. > Wouldn't it be better to track down the

Re: svn commit: r232473 - in head: share/mk sys/conf

2012-03-03 Thread Doug Barton
On 03/03/2012 10:58, Dimitry Andric wrote: > However, since it is apparently an expected use case to build using old > .mk files, Expected how? It shouldn't happen if you're building in /usr/src. Wouldn't it be better to track down the real bug? -- This .signature sanitized for your prote

svn commit: r232473 - in head: share/mk sys/conf

2012-03-03 Thread Dimitry Andric
Author: dim Date: Sat Mar 3 18:58:15 2012 New Revision: 232473 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/232473 Log: After r232322, it turned out many people (and some ports) are building kernel modules using their old installed /usr/share/mk/bsd.*.mk files, instead of the updated ones in