On 04/12/2011, at 11:31 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 12/03/11 12:02, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>> On Friday 02 December 2011 07:27 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
>>> On Thursday 01 December 2011 11:43 pm, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 12/02/11 03:43, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Thursday 01 December 2011 1
On 12/03/11 12:02, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2011 07:27 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Thursday 01 December 2011 11:43 pm, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 12/02/11 03:43, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Thursday 01 December 2011 10:11 am, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/30/11 05:09, Jung-uk Kim wrot
On 03/12/2011, at 12:02 PM, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
[snip]
>
> - The snippet of code at the beginning of catchpacket() that
> was manipulating the struct bintime derived from bpf_gettime()
> was gross and has been removed in favour of selecting the
> right {get}bin{up}time() func
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2011 07:27 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
Please see my patch:
http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/bpf_ffclock.diff
I booted up the kernel and found it just crashes because of stupid
typos. Now a new patch is uploaded in place. Sorry.
Anyw
On Friday 02 December 2011 07:27 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Thursday 01 December 2011 11:43 pm, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> > On 12/02/11 03:43, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > > On Thursday 01 December 2011 10:11 am, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> > >> On 11/30/11 05:09, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > >>> On Tuesday 29
On Thursday 01 December 2011 11:43 pm, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 12/02/11 03:43, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Thursday 01 December 2011 10:11 am, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >> On 11/30/11 05:09, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 29 November 2011 11:13 am, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 11/30/11
On 12/02/11 03:43, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Thursday 01 December 2011 10:11 am, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/30/11 05:09, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 11:13 am, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/30/11 00:05, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/28/11 14:59, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed,
On Thursday 01 December 2011 10:11 am, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 11/30/11 05:09, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 29 November 2011 11:13 am, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >> On 11/30/11 00:05, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >>> On 11/28/11 14:59, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Lawrenc
On 11/30/11 05:09, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 11:13 am, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/30/11 00:05, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/28/11 14:59, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/23/11 17:42, Julien Ridoux wrote:
[snip]
What is your
On Tuesday 29 November 2011 11:13 am, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 11/30/11 00:05, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> > On 11/28/11 14:59, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> >> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >>> On 11/23/11 17:42, Julien Ridoux wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> What is your favourite option?
On 11/30/11 00:05, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/28/11 14:59, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/23/11 17:42, Julien Ridoux wrote:
[snip]
What is your favourite option?
FreeBSD parlance is to ask what colour you would like to paint the
bikeshed ;)
As
On 11/28/11 14:59, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/23/11 17:42, Julien Ridoux wrote:
Thanks all for the feedback. With some delay, I have a patch against
r227871 that implements what Lawrence proposed. You can find it
here:
http://www.cubinlab.ee.unime
On 11/29/11 06:20, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 2:37:05 am Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/23/11 17:42, Julien Ridoux wrote:
On 23/11/2011, at 1:00 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/23/11 00:30, John Baldwin wrote:
Think of standalone modules that are not built as part
On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 2:37:05 am Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 11/23/11 17:42, Julien Ridoux wrote:
> >
> > On 23/11/2011, at 1:00 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/23/11 00:30, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>> Think of standalone modules that are not built as part of a
> >>> kernel (e.g
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/23/11 17:42, Julien Ridoux wrote:
Thanks all for the feedback. With some delay, I have a patch against
r227871 that implements what Lawrence proposed. You can find it
here:
http://www.cubinlab.ee.unimelb.edu.au/~jrid/patches/ffclock-bpf-header
On 11/23/11 17:42, Julien Ridoux wrote:
On 23/11/2011, at 1:00 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/23/11 00:30, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2011 2:28:10 am Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/21/11 17:18, Julien Ridoux wrote:
On 21/11/2011, at 4:39 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On
On 23/11/2011, at 1:00 AM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 11/23/11 00:30, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Monday, November 21, 2011 2:28:10 am Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>>> On 11/21/11 17:18, Julien Ridoux wrote:
On 21/11/2011, at 4:39 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 11/21/11 16:12, B
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
Think of standalone modules that are not built as part of a kernel (e.g.
3rd party device drivers). In general we should avoid having structures
change size for kernel options, especially common structures. It just adds
lots of pain and suffering and c
On 11/23/11 00:30, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2011 2:28:10 am Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/21/11 17:18, Julien Ridoux wrote:
On 21/11/2011, at 4:39 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/21/11 16:12, Ben Kaduk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Lawrence
Stewartwrote:
On Monday, November 21, 2011 2:28:10 am Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 11/21/11 17:18, Julien Ridoux wrote:
> >
> > On 21/11/2011, at 4:39 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/21/11 16:12, Ben Kaduk wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Lawrence
> >>> Stewart wrote:
> Author: ls
On 11/21/11 20:52, Julien Ridoux wrote:
On 21/11/2011, at 7:28 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/21/11 18:28, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/21/11 17:18, Julien Ridoux wrote:
On 21/11/2011, at 4:39 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/21/11 16:12, Ben Kaduk wrote:
[snip]
Is it really necess
On 21/11/2011, at 7:28 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 11/21/11 18:28, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>> On 11/21/11 17:18, Julien Ridoux wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21/11/2011, at 4:39 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>>>
On 11/21/11 16:12, Ben Kaduk wrote:
> [snip]
> Is it really necessary to make the AB
On 11/21/11 18:28, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/21/11 17:18, Julien Ridoux wrote:
On 21/11/2011, at 4:39 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/21/11 16:12, Ben Kaduk wrote:
[snip]
Is it really necessary to make the ABI dependent on a kernel
configuration option? This causes all sorts of headac
On 11/21/11 17:18, Julien Ridoux wrote:
On 21/11/2011, at 4:39 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 11/21/11 16:12, Ben Kaduk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Lawrence
Stewart wrote:
Author: lstewart Date: Mon Nov 21 04:17:24 2011 New Revision:
227778 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changese
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Julien Ridoux
wrote:
>
> On 21/11/2011, at 4:39 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
>
>> On 11/21/11 16:12, Ben Kaduk wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Lawrence Stewart
>>> wrote:
Author: lstewart
Date: Mon Nov 21 04:17:24 2011
New Revision: 22
On 21/11/2011, at 4:39 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 11/21/11 16:12, Ben Kaduk wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Lawrence Stewart
>> wrote:
>>> Author: lstewart
>>> Date: Mon Nov 21 04:17:24 2011
>>> New Revision: 227778
>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227778
>>>
>>
On 11/21/11 16:12, Ben Kaduk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Author: lstewart
Date: Mon Nov 21 04:17:24 2011
New Revision: 227778
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227778
Log:
- When feed-forward clock support is compiled in, change the BPF header to
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 11:17 PM, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> Author: lstewart
> Date: Mon Nov 21 04:17:24 2011
> New Revision: 227778
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227778
>
> Log:
> - When feed-forward clock support is compiled in, change the BPF header to
> contain both a regula
Author: lstewart
Date: Mon Nov 21 04:17:24 2011
New Revision: 227778
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227778
Log:
- When feed-forward clock support is compiled in, change the BPF header to
contain both a regular timestamp obtained from the system clock and the
current feed-forw
29 matches
Mail list logo