On Wed Jan 5 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:38:16 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Wed Jan 5 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 2:59:20 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> > > > On 01/05/2011 10:59, Alexander Best wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > judging from the
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:38:16 pm Alexander Best wrote:
> On Wed Jan 5 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 2:59:20 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> > > On 01/05/2011 10:59, Alexander Best wrote:
> > >
> > > > judging from the discussion going on right now it seems those flag
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:29:57 pm Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-01-05 21:08, John Baldwin wrote:
> > My suggestion was that we ask clang to add a '-mno-whatever' and hopefully
> > we
> > could convince gcc to follow suit. clang developers seem to be fairly
> > receptive, so I was hoping
On Wed Jan 5 11, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 10:59, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> >judging from the discussion going on right now it seems those flags will be
> >grouped together to form a new variable. so things will probably change
> >shortly
> >and fixing the order is probably not necessar
On Wed Jan 5 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 2:59:20 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> > On 01/05/2011 10:59, Alexander Best wrote:
> >
> > > judging from the discussion going on right now it seems those flags will
> > > be
> > > grouped together to form a new variable. so things
On 2011-01-05 21:08, John Baldwin wrote:
My suggestion was that we ask clang to add a '-mno-whatever' and hopefully we
could convince gcc to follow suit. clang developers seem to be fairly
receptive, so I was hoping one of our clang liaisons could suggest it. :)
These options already exist, e.
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 2:59:20 pm Doug Barton wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 10:59, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> > judging from the discussion going on right now it seems those flags will be
> > grouped together to form a new variable. so things will probably change
> > shortly
> > and fixing the or
On 01/05/2011 10:59, Alexander Best wrote:
judging from the discussion going on right now it seems those flags will be
grouped together to form a new variable. so things will probably change shortly
and fixing the order is probably not necessary.
Much better to fix the problem properly now tha
On Wed Jan 5 11, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 10:04:43 am Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > On 2011-01-05 15:50, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> > > You would also want this to be cross-platform, in which case it's more
> > > than floating point. E.g. on powerpc, you also want to disable
On Wed Jan 5 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-01-05 02:16, Alexander Best wrote:
> >the sorting order for these flags seems to be:
> >
> >-mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3
> >
> >see 'grep -R "\-no-sse" /usr/src'. maybe the sorting order should stay
> >consistent?
>
> I copied t
On 01/05/2011 05:59, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 7:19:10 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (05/01/2011 01:16), Alexander Best wrote:
On Tue Jan 4 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
Author: dim
Date: Tue Jan 4 20:51:28 2011
New Revision: 216977
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 10:04:43 am Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-01-05 15:50, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> > You would also want this to be cross-platform, in which case it's more
> > than floating point. E.g. on powerpc, you also want to disable both FP
> > and vector extensions, which use
On 2011-01-05 15:50, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
You would also want this to be cross-platform, in which case it's more
than floating point. E.g. on powerpc, you also want to disable both FP
and vector extensions, which use separate sets of instructions and
registers.
Yeah, but in any case, hacking
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 9:50:40 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 01/05/11 08:28, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 8:36:06 am Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >> On 2011-01-05 13:59, John Baldwin wrote:
> Why not to add NO_HWFLOAT knob (or similar) into makefile
> infras
On 01/05/11 08:28, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 8:36:06 am Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-01-05 13:59, John Baldwin wrote:
Why not to add NO_HWFLOAT knob (or similar) into makefile
infrastructure. And set CFLAGS accordingly, depending on CC, arch, etc.
These flags are getti
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 8:36:06 am Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-01-05 13:59, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Why not to add NO_HWFLOAT knob (or similar) into makefile
> >> infrastructure. And set CFLAGS accordingly, depending on CC, arch, etc.
> >> These flags are getting rather common in tree.
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 7:19:10 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> > On (05/01/2011 01:16), Alexander Best wrote:
> > > On Tue Jan 4 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > > > Author: dim
> > > > Date: Tue Jan 4 20:51:28 2011
> > > > New Revision: 216977
> > > > UR
On 2011-01-05 13:59, John Baldwin wrote:
Why not to add NO_HWFLOAT knob (or similar) into makefile
infrastructure. And set CFLAGS accordingly, depending on CC, arch, etc.
These flags are getting rather common in tree.
It strikes me that we really want clang/gcc to have some sort of
'-mno-hwfloa
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011 7:19:10 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> On (05/01/2011 01:16), Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Tue Jan 4 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > > Author: dim
> > > Date: Tue Jan 4 20:51:28 2011
> > > New Revision: 216977
> > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/216977
> > >
>
On (05/01/2011 01:16), Alexander Best wrote:
> On Tue Jan 4 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > Author: dim
> > Date: Tue Jan 4 20:51:28 2011
> > New Revision: 216977
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/216977
> >
> > Log:
> > On amd64 and i386, tell the compiler to refrain from generatin
On 2011-01-05 02:16, Alexander Best wrote:
the sorting order for these flags seems to be:
-mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3
see 'grep -R "\-no-sse" /usr/src'. maybe the sorting order should stay
consistent?
I copied the order from sys/conf/kern.mk, lines 69 and 70:
-mf
On Wed Jan 5 11, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Tue Jan 4 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> > Author: dim
> > Date: Tue Jan 4 20:51:28 2011
> > New Revision: 216977
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/216977
> >
> > Log:
> > On amd64 and i386, tell the compiler to refrain from generating SSE
On Tue Jan 4 11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Author: dim
> Date: Tue Jan 4 20:51:28 2011
> New Revision: 216977
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/216977
>
> Log:
> On amd64 and i386, tell the compiler to refrain from generating SSE,
> 3DNow, MMX and floating point instructions in rtld
Author: dim
Date: Tue Jan 4 20:51:28 2011
New Revision: 216977
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/216977
Log:
On amd64 and i386, tell the compiler to refrain from generating SSE,
3DNow, MMX and floating point instructions in rtld-elf.
Otherwise, _rtld_bind() (and whatever it call
24 matches
Mail list logo
