On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 17:13, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>
> > Interesting, it seems Clang doesn't even warn in the case of casting a
> > uint64_t to a 32-bit pointer. Looks like there are some useful
> > warnings that ought to be implemented.
>
> There is -Wconversion for this, or the more specific -W
On 25 Sep 2019, at 15:36, Ed Maste wrote:
>
> On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 17:39, Bruce Evans wrote:
>>
>> On i386, these types have different sizes, so
>> gcc detects the type mismatch. clang is too broken to report this type
>> mismatch.
>
> Interesting, it seems Clang doesn't even warn in the ca
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 17:39, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On i386, these types have different sizes, so
> gcc detects the type mismatch. clang is too broken to report this type
> mismatch.
Interesting, it seems Clang doesn't even warn in the case of casting a
uint64_t to a 32-bit pointer. Looks like
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019, Randall Stewart wrote:
Log:
lets put (void) in a couple of functions to keep older platforms that
are stuck with gcc happy (ppc). The changes are needed in both bbr and
rack.
You mean "Don't use K&R declarations. clang is too broken to warn about
K&R declarations even
