On 4/25/17 8:10 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Rodney W. Grimes
> wrote:
>>> I'd very much prefer if you created a new entry saying this one isn't
>>> relevant any more. It's still relevant to all versions between 304436
>>> and 316527.
>>>
>>> Warner
>>
>> Won't it appe
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Rodney W. Grimes
wrote:
>> I'd very much prefer if you created a new entry saying this one isn't
>> relevant any more. It's still relevant to all versions between 304436
>> and 316527.
>>
>> Warner
>
> Won't it appear in the copy of UPDATING in any checked out tree
> I'd very much prefer if you created a new entry saying this one isn't
> relevant any more. It's still relevant to all versions between 304436
> and 316527.
>
> Warner
Won't it appear in the copy of UPDATING in any checked out tree
checked out between those revisions?
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at
I'd very much prefer if you created a new entry saying this one isn't
relevant any more. It's still relevant to all versions between 304436
and 316527.
Warner
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> Author: bdrewery
> Date: Wed Apr 26 00:41:18 2017
> New Revision: 317432
> URL: h
