On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 03:03:07PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
Oops. It is only declared in outside of the kernel.
Only __uintfptr_t is always declared by sys/types.h.
So what is the intended use of the uintfptr_t type ? Looking at the
implemen
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 03:03:07PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Oops. It is only declared in outside of the kernel.
> Only __uintfptr_t is always declared by sys/types.h.
So what is the intended use of the uintfptr_t type ? Looking at the
implementation only, I am unable to find a difference wit
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, Ian Lepore wrote:
Log:
Go back to using uintptr_t, because code that actually compiles is
infinitely less buggy than code that is theoretically correct in some
alternate universe.
The uintfptr_t type is apparently a freebsd invention, and exists only when
compiling the
