On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 12:02:23AM -0700, David Schultz wrote:
> Fortran has its own problems and isn't very well supported.
I take issue with the later assertion. Fortran is well
support in GCC >4.6. See GCC list of front-end maintainers. :-)
> But for what it's worth, C++ is actually a good
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 29 Jul 2013, at 08:05, David Schultz wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, David Chisnall wrote:
> >> +static __inline int
> >> +__inline_isnan(double __x)
> >> +{
> >> +
> >> + return (__x != __x);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static __inline int
> >> +__in
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, David Schultz wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, David Chisnall wrote:
+static __inline int
+__inline_isnan(double __x)
+{
+
+ return (__x != __x);
+}
+
+static __inline int
+__inline_isnanf(float __x)
+{
+
+ return (__x != __x);
+}
+
+static __inline int
+__inline_is
On 29 Jul 2013, at 08:05, David Schultz wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, David Chisnall wrote:
>> +static __inline int
>> +__inline_isnan(double __x)
>> +{
>> +
>> +return (__x != __x);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static __inline int
>> +__inline_isnanf(float __x)
>> +{
>> +
>> +return (__x != __x);
>>
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, David Chisnall wrote:
> +static __inline int
> +__inline_isnan(double __x)
> +{
> +
> + return (__x != __x);
> +}
> +
> +static __inline int
> +__inline_isnanf(float __x)
> +{
> +
> + return (__x != __x);
> +}
> +
> +static __inline int
> +__inline_isnanl(long double _
On Sat, 13 Jul 2013, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-07-12 11:14, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-07-11 22:03, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
...
isnan(double) is part of SUSv2. It should be visible when compiling with
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500. I think you need something
On 2013-07-12 11:14, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> On 2013-07-11 22:03, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>>> On 2013-07-11 21:36, David Chisnall wrote:
On 11 Jul 2013, at 19:52, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>> @@ -227,8 +250,6 @@ doubleexpm1(double);
>> double
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-07-11 22:03, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
On 2013-07-11 21:36, David Chisnall wrote:
On 11 Jul 2013, at 19:52, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
@@ -227,8 +250,6 @@ double expm1(double);
double fma(double, double, double);
double hypot(double, double);
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, David Chisnall wrote:
On 11 Jul 2013, at 19:52, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
GCC doesn't support _Generic yet for -std=c11.
Ugh. Given that they also lack a fine-grained feature check mechanism, they
really should not advertise support for a language dialect if they don't
s
On 2013-07-11 22:03, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> On 2013-07-11 21:36, David Chisnall wrote:
>> On 11 Jul 2013, at 19:52, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
@@ -227,8 +250,6 @@ double expm1(double);
double fma(double, double, double);
double hypot(double, double);
intilogb(double
On 2013-07-11 21:36, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2013, at 19:52, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>>> @@ -227,8 +250,6 @@ double expm1(double);
>>> double fma(double, double, double);
>>> double hypot(double, double);
>>> int ilogb(double) __pure2;
>>> -int(isinf)(double) __pure2;
>>
On 11 Jul 2013, at 19:52, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
> GCC doesn't support _Generic yet for -std=c11.
Ugh. Given that they also lack a fine-grained feature check mechanism, they
really should not advertise support for a language dialect if they don't
support it.
>
>> +#elif __GNUC_PREREQ__(5, 1)
On 2013-07-11 19:41, David Chisnall wrote:
> Author: theraven
> Date: Thu Jul 11 17:41:04 2013
> New Revision: 253215
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/253215
>
> Log:
> Cleanups to math.h that prevent namespace conflicts with C++.
>
> Reviewed by:bde
> MFC after: 3
13 matches
Mail list logo
