On 2013-02-20 10:49, Stefan Farfeleder wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:32:43AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
>>On 20 Feb 2013, at 08:25, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>> These should be declared const int *. And the cast shouldn't be
>>> needed in C, since void * can be assigned to any other pointer
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:32:43AM +, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2013, at 08:25, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>
> > These should be declared const int *. And the cast shouldn't be
> > needed in C, since void * can be assigned to any other pointer type.
>
> In fact, the entire function body
On 2013-02-20 09:32, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2013, at 08:25, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > These should be declared const int *. And the cast shouldn't be
> > needed in C, since void * can be assigned to any other pointer type.
>
> In fact, the entire function body can be replaced with:
>
On 20 Feb 2013, at 08:25, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> These should be declared const int *. And the cast shouldn't be
> needed in C, since void * can be assigned to any other pointer type.
In fact, the entire function body can be replaced with:
return (*(int*)p1 - *(int*)p2);
qsort doesn't req
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> Author: keramida (doc committer)
> Date: Tue Feb 19 23:57:39 2013
> New Revision: 247014
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/247014
>
> Log:
> Add a sample program that shows how a custom comparison function and
> qsort(3)
