On Wed, 23 May 2012, David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:49:45PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-05-22 20:18, David E. O'Brien wrote:
Log:
Do not incorrectly warn when printing a quad_t using "%qd" on 64-bit
platforms.
...
Until all the additional warnings this causes hav
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 02:07:22PM -0700, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> We run with the following at Isilon, which is somewhat bogus because
> it allows a bit of sloppiness in types, but is also terribly
> convenient since it means no casting on printf arguments is needed:
...
> If there's no objectio
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 01:49:45PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-22 20:18, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> > Log:
> > Do not incorrectly warn when printing a quad_t using "%qd" on 64-bit
> > platforms.
...
> Until all the additional warnings this causes have been fixed, can this
> commit p
On 2012-05-22 20:18, David E. O'Brien wrote:
> Author: obrien
> Date: Tue May 22 18:18:06 2012
> New Revision: 235797
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235797
>
> Log:
> Do not incorrectly warn when printing a quad_t using "%qd" on 64-bit
> platforms.
>
> Modified:
> head/contrib/
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On May 22, 2012, at 11:41 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-05-22 23:07, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
We run with the following at Isilon, which is somewhat bogus because
it allows a bit of sloppiness in types, but is also terribly
convenient since i
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On May 22, 2012, at 2:07 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012, David E. O'Brien wrote:
Log:
Do not incorrectly warn when printing a quad_t using "%qd" on 64-bit
platforms.
I think
On Tue, 22 May 2012 g...@freebsd.org wrote:
At Wed, 23 May 2012 06:05:06 +1000 (EST),
Bruce Evans wrote:
[... excessive quoting deleted]
Now I prefer the old way, after fixing the bugs found by switching.
It finds more bugs under FreeBSD, and is bug for bug compatible with
distribution gcc a
On May 22, 2012, at 11:41 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2012-05-22 23:07, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> ...
>> We run with the following at Isilon, which is somewhat bogus because
>> it allows a bit of sloppiness in types, but is also terribly
>> convenient since it means no casting on printf argume
On 2012-05-22 23:07, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
> We run with the following at Isilon, which is somewhat bogus because
> it allows a bit of sloppiness in types, but is also terribly
> convenient since it means no casting on printf arguments is needed:
Please don't. If you want to write portable
On May 22, 2012, at 2:07 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 May 2012, David E. O'Brien wrote:
>>
>>> Log:
>>> Do not incorrectly warn when printing a quad_t using "%qd" on 64-bit
>>> platforms.
>>
>>
>> I think I like this, since i
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2012, David E. O'Brien wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> Do not incorrectly warn when printing a quad_t using "%qd" on 64-bit
>> platforms.
>
>
> I think I like this, since it is technically correct, and will find a
> different set of type mi
At Wed, 23 May 2012 06:05:06 +1000 (EST),
Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 May 2012, David E. O'Brien wrote:
>
> > Log:
> > Do not incorrectly warn when printing a quad_t using "%qd" on 64-bit
> > platforms.
>
> I think I like this, since it is technically correct, and will find a
> different
On Tue, 22 May 2012, David E. O'Brien wrote:
Log:
Do not incorrectly warn when printing a quad_t using "%qd" on 64-bit platforms.
I think I like this, since it is technically correct, and will find a
different set of type mismatches.
Modified: head/contrib/gcc/c-format.c
===
13 matches
Mail list logo
