On Sun Nov 6 11, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> * Alexander Best , 2006 23:30:
> > +The
> > +.Fl a, d
> > +and
> > +.Fl s
> > +options are mutually exclusive.
> > +.Pp
> > +The
> > +.Fl H, L
> > +and
> > +.Fl P
> > +options are mutually exclusive.
>
> This can already be derived from
Hi Alexander,
* Alexander Best , 2006 23:30:
> +The
> +.Fl a, d
> +and
> +.Fl s
> +options are mutually exclusive.
> +.Pp
> +The
> +.Fl H, L
> +and
> +.Fl P
> +options are mutually exclusive.
This can already be derived from the SYNOPSIS, right?
--
Ed Schouten
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgp
On Sun Nov 6 11, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> * Alexander Best , 2006 21:46:
> > this diff was flying around in my /usr/src, which makes some code a bit more
> > readable. maybe this is something worth having in HEAD?
>
> Looks good. It seems we can also get rid of the `listall' va
Hi Alexander,
* Alexander Best , 2006 21:46:
> this diff was flying around in my /usr/src, which makes some code a bit more
> readable. maybe this is something worth having in HEAD?
Looks good. It seems we can also get rid of the `listall' variable here.
The rest of the code also uses the `*f
On Sun Nov 6 11, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Author: ed
> Date: Sun Nov 6 08:15:17 2011
> New Revision: 227164
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227164
>
> Log:
> Add missing static keywords to du(1)
this diff was flying around in my /usr/src, which makes some code a bit more
readable. ma
