On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, David Xu wrote:
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:20 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
[ snip ]
Unfortunately, it seems to have a regression:
%cat test.c
#include
#include
static pthread_cond_t static_cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
static pthread_mutex_t st
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:20 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:02 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 09:31 am, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:57:56 am David Xu wrote:
Author: davidxu
Date: Tue Sep 28 04:57:5
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:20 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:02 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 September 2010 09:31 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:57:56 am David Xu wrote:
> > > > Author: davidxu
> > > > Date: Tue Sep 28 04:5
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 12:02 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 September 2010 09:31 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:57:56 am David Xu wrote:
> > > Author: davidxu
> > > Date: Tue Sep 28 04:57:56 2010
> > > New Revision: 213241
> > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.o
On Tuesday 28 September 2010 09:31 am, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:57:56 am David Xu wrote:
> > Author: davidxu
> > Date: Tue Sep 28 04:57:56 2010
> > New Revision: 213241
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/213241
> >
> > Log:
> > In current code, staticall
On Tuesday, September 28, 2010 12:57:56 am David Xu wrote:
> Author: davidxu
> Date: Tue Sep 28 04:57:56 2010
> New Revision: 213241
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/213241
>
> Log:
> In current code, statically initialized and destroyed object have
> same null value, the code can