Re: [SOLUTION] Re: svn commit: r358411 - head/contrib/sendmail/src

2020-03-04 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 22:26:32 +0700 > Eugene Grosbein said: > No, I never do r515574 back. The other ports depending upon > cyrus-sasl2 must be linked same version of openssl. So, there is an > option "DEFAULT_VERSIONS= ssl=base". Your hack breaks this premise and > confuse people.

Re: [SOLUTION] Re: svn commit: r358411 - head/contrib/sendmail/src

2020-03-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
04.03.2020 21:43, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > Hi, > >> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 21:07:10 +0700 >> Eugene Grosbein said: > > eugen> Dear maintainer, please consider applying r515574 back. > > No, I never do r515574 back. The other ports depending upon > cyrus-sasl2 must be linked same version of

Re: [SOLUTION] Re: svn commit: r358411 - head/contrib/sendmail/src

2020-03-04 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 21:07:10 +0700 > Eugene Grosbein said: eugen> Dear maintainer, please consider applying r515574 back. No, I never do r515574 back. The other ports depending upon cyrus-sasl2 must be linked same version of openssl. So, there is an option "DEFAULT_VERSIONS= ssl=

Re: [SOLUTION] Re: svn commit: r358411 - head/contrib/sendmail/src

2020-03-04 Thread Jung-uk Kim
On 20. 3. 4., Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 04.03.2020 0:10, John Baldwin wrote: > >> When the handbook text was first written we didn't have an OpenSSL in ports >> that would conflict > > Thank you very much for this key for solving the problem. > This occured to be missing bit of information I was

[SOLUTION] Re: svn commit: r358411 - head/contrib/sendmail/src

2020-03-04 Thread Eugene Grosbein
04.03.2020 0:10, John Baldwin wrote: > When the handbook text was first written we didn't have an OpenSSL in ports > that would conflict Thank you very much for this key for solving the problem. This occured to be missing bit of information I was looking for. So, the fix is simple. We need only