Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 01:49:16, danfe wrote about "Re: svn commit: r227366 - in
head/etc: . rc.d":
> > rc.d: Eliminate some unnecessary non-POSIX constructs:
> >
> >* ^ in character class
> >
> > - for file in ${dir}/[^0-9]*.sh; do
> > + for file in
Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 15:45:37, adrian wrote about "Re: svn commit: r241576 -
in head/usr.sbin/cron: cron crontab lib":
> Why not sleep for the amonut of time needed before the next event?
If you do this for all events listed currently in all crontabs, you
need event engine. Currently request t
Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 00:24:08, wollman wrote about "Re: svn commit: r200369 -
in head: etc share/termcap":
> > It's great, thank!!
> > I believe that our xterm entry was modified not to clear screen when
> > applications such as less(1) are terminated. Are there any chance to
> > back to the b
Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 15:55:08, yanefbsd wrote about "Re: svn commit: r204103 -
in head/usr.bin: . seq":
> >> Add seq(1), a small utility to generate sequence number.
> > Why do we need this when we have jot(1)?
> Agreed. FreeBSD isn't Linux (seq is a non-standard GNU tool).
> -Garrett
jot is
Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 17:13:00, ivoras wrote about "Re: I486_CPU and I586_CPU
removed from GENERIC kernel [was Re: svn commit: r205307 -
head/sys/i386/conf]":
> SSE in the userland you mean? Regardless, I don't think there is now
> reason for compiling everything as for i386. E.g. why not add a
