12.10.2020 10:33, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 09:17:42PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020, 8:13 PM Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>> ...
>>> I still don't understand how could rm be better than graceful disabling
>>> alternative configuration with nextboot_enable="
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 09:17:42PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020, 8:13 PM Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > ...
> > I still don't understand how could rm be better than graceful disabling
> > alternative configuration with nextboot_enable="NO". I most certainly
> > do *not* like when
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020, 8:13 PM Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 09:12:43AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > ...
> > There were cases that were discussed when the feature went in that
> > required it to be removed in some failure modes for full functionality.
> > I don't recall if the
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 09:12:43AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> ...
> There were cases that were discussed when the feature went in that
> required it to be removed in some failure modes for full functionality.
> I don't recall if they were in the rc thread or somewhere else.
You mean, literally de
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020, 8:00 AM Kyle Evans wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 8:30 AM Alexey Dokuchaev
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 04:08:09PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote:
> > > > On 11. Oct 2020, at 16:01, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > >> ...
> > > >> Also nextboot.conf not generic config
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 8:30 AM Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 04:08:09PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote:
> > > On 11. Oct 2020, at 16:01, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > >> ...
> > >> Also nextboot.conf not generic configuration file (such as loader.conf
> > >> or loader.conf.local),
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 04:08:09PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote:
> > On 11. Oct 2020, at 16:01, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Also nextboot.conf not generic configuration file (such as loader.conf
> >> or loader.conf.local), but the implementation specific file, part of
> >> special feature.
>
> On 11. Oct 2020, at 16:01, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 03:20:16PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote:
>> Please note, the remove is done by rc script during the boot.
>
> But not by the loader(8) as the page used to claim. It confused me how to
> avoid the remove, and only l
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 03:20:16PM +0300, Toomas Soome wrote:
> Please note, the remove is done by rc script during the boot.
But not by the loader(8) as the page used to claim. It confused me how to
avoid the remove, and only later I've discovered with some relief that it
is in fact not being re
Please note, the remove is done by rc script during the boot. Also
nextboot.conf not generic configuration file (such as loader.conf or
loader.conf.local), but the implementation specific file, part of special
feature. That is, one should not assume the presence of nextboot.conf file,
make assu
Author: danfe (ports committer)
Date: Sun Oct 11 10:40:11 2020
New Revision: 366626
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/366626
Log:
The nextboot(8) manual page currently says that the loader(8) would delete
the /boot/nextboot.conf file or its contents which is 1) not the most user-
11 matches
Mail list logo