On 2019-12-11 10:26, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
That's one of those things that make Linux so unpleasant to work with.
Frankly, I don't think we want that for FreeBSD.
The argument for the current callback is still a "void *".
container_of() has some type checks at least.
It is not a big deal tho
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 11:09:41PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 2019-12-10 22:58, John Baldwin wrote:
> > While here, add to the manpage.
>
> FYI:
>
> Linux guys eliminated the "void *c_arg" in their timer implementation by
> using container_of() to get callback argument. We could po
On 2019-12-10 23:47, John Baldwin wrote:
You mean passing the pointer to the callout itself and using that to get to the
relevant pointer?
Yes.
--HPS
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To u
In message , John Baldwin
writes:
>On 12/10/19 2:09 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> On 2019-12-10 22:58, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> While here, add to the manpage.
>>
>> FYI:
>>
>> Linux guys eliminated the "void *c_arg" in their timer implementation by
>> using container_of() to get
On 12/10/19 2:09 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On 2019-12-10 22:58, John Baldwin wrote:
>> While here, add to the manpage.
>
> FYI:
>
> Linux guys eliminated the "void *c_arg" in their timer implementation by
> using container_of() to get callback argument. We could possibly do the
> same
On 2019-12-10 22:58, John Baldwin wrote:
While here, add to the manpage.
FYI:
Linux guys eliminated the "void *c_arg" in their timer implementation by
using container_of() to get callback argument. We could possibly do the
same!
--HPS
___
svn-
Author: jhb
Date: Tue Dec 10 21:58:30 2019
New Revision: 355600
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/355600
Log:
Add a callout_func_t typedef for functions used with callout_*().
This typedef is the same as timeout_t except that it is in the callout
namespace and header.
Us
