On 7/10/19 9:48 PM, Randall Stewart wrote:
> John:
>
> Thanks for the suggestions.. I have committed changes to the two
> nits. As to M_PROTO1, I see that in the NF world we have removed
> M_PROTO12 and moved the M_PROTO’s up 1 i.e. M_PROTO1 == 0x2000
>
> So for now it is safe, since the M_TSTMP_
John:
Thanks for the suggestions.. I have committed changes to the two
nits. As to M_PROTO1, I see that in the NF world we have removed
M_PROTO12 and moved the M_PROTO’s up 1 i.e. M_PROTO1 == 0x2000
So for now it is safe, since the M_TSTMP_LRO is not yet used.. but in
my up and coming commits I w
On 7/10/19 1:40 PM, Randall Stewart wrote:
> Author: rrs
> Date: Wed Jul 10 20:40:39 2019
> New Revision: 349893
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/349893
>
> Log:
> This commit updates rack to what is basically being used at NF as
> well as sets in some of the groundwork for com
Author: rrs
Date: Wed Jul 10 20:40:39 2019
New Revision: 349893
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/349893
Log:
This commit updates rack to what is basically being used at NF as
well as sets in some of the groundwork for committing BBR. The
hpts system is updated as well as some o
