On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 8:36 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2018, at 15:05, Conrad Meyer wrote:
>
>> Hi Bjoern,
>>
>> It might be nice to be explicit that the vnode was not in the
>> namecache (in the ddb output) rather than failing silently. The name
>> of the ddb method does not suggest
On 20 Jun 2018, at 15:05, Conrad Meyer wrote:
> Hi Bjoern,
>
> It might be nice to be explicit that the vnode was not in the
> namecache (in the ddb output) rather than failing silently. The name
> of the ddb method does not suggest that only entries in the namecache
> may be found, and users (de
Hi Bjoern,
It might be nice to be explicit that the vnode was not in the
namecache (in the ddb output) rather than failing silently. The name
of the ddb method does not suggest that only entries in the namecache
may be found, and users (developers :)) do not always read manual
pages thoroughly.
Author: bz
Date: Wed Jun 20 08:34:29 2018
New Revision: 335437
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/335437
Log:
Sometimes it is helpful to get the path for a vnode.
Implement a ddb function walking the namecache to do this.
Reviewed by: jhb, mjg
Inspired by:
