I have something I'm testing now, but it's tricky enough that I want to
look at it again in the morning...
Warner
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:48:00PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > Yes. This fix was easy. That fix is a little harder, so
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:48:00PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> Yes. This fix was easy. That fix is a little harder, so I pushed this
> inquickly while I do the harder fix after a good night's sleep (it isn't
> that much harder, but it's been a long day).
Awesome to hear that, thanks Warner and hav
Yes. This fix was easy. That fix is a little harder, so I pushed this
inquickly while I do the harder fix after a good night's sleep (it isn't
that much harder, but it's been a long day).
Warner
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 04:32:43AM +
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 04:32:43AM +, Warner Losh wrote:
> New Revision: 287241
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/287241
>
> Log:
> Add another .WAIT since sometimes we lose the race.
Is there a way to actually correctly specify dependencies between targets
instead?
./danfe
Author: imp
Date: Fri Aug 28 04:32:43 2015
New Revision: 287241
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/287241
Log:
Add another .WAIT since sometimes we lose the race.
Modified:
head/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/Makefile
Modified: head/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/Makefile
===
