On Tue, 4 Aug 2015, Ed Schouten wrote:
2015-08-04 20:23 GMT+02:00 Warner Losh :
There???s at least one compiler in common use that warns about
extern int fred[1];
extern int fred[1];
being a repeated declaration (despite being legal C).
Would you happen to know which one that is?
All non-
2015-08-04 20:23 GMT+02:00 Warner Losh :
> There’s at least one compiler in common use that warns about
>
> extern int fred[1];
> extern int fred[1];
>
> being a repeated declaration (despite being legal C).
Would you happen to know which one that is?
--
Ed Schouten
Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the
> On Aug 4, 2015, at 12:19 PM, Ed Schouten wrote:
>
> 2015-07-31 8:21 GMT+02:00 Bruce Evans :
>> For gcc before 4.6,
>> the ifdef reduces to using __COUNTER__ as the second variable if
>> __COUNTER__ is supported, else nothing. So for the undocumented
>> subset of compilers that support __COUNT
2015-07-31 8:21 GMT+02:00 Bruce Evans :
> For gcc before 4.6,
> the ifdef reduces to using __COUNTER__ as the second variable if
> __COUNTER__ is supported, else nothing. So for the undocumented
> subset of compilers that support __COUNTER__ all cases work, and
> for the complementary subset no ca
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > On Jul 31, 2015, at 10:31 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >
> > Do we support linking man pages between man3/man9? or should it just
> > be in a comment? and in one section?
>
> Put them in section 9 with a note saying they work for user l
Warner Losh wrote this message on Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:37 -0600:
>
> > On Jul 31, 2015, at 10:31 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> >
> > Ed Schouten wrote this message on Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:24 +0200:
> >> Maybe it would make more sense to just remove this manual page?
> >>
> >> It looks lik
> On Jul 31, 2015, at 10:31 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> Ed Schouten wrote this message on Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:24 +0200:
>> Maybe it would make more sense to just remove this manual page?
>>
>> It looks like there are already some pieces of code in our source tree
>> that use _Static_ass
Ed Schouten wrote this message on Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 11:24 +0200:
> Maybe it would make more sense to just remove this manual page?
>
> It looks like there are already some pieces of code in our source tree
> that use _Static_assert(), which is good. Maybe it would be better to
> to leave CTASSE
> On Jul 31, 2015, at 3:24 AM, Ed Schouten wrote:
>
> Hi John-Mark,
>
> Maybe it would make more sense to just remove this manual page?
>
> It looks like there are already some pieces of code in our source tree
> that use _Static_assert(), which is good. Maybe it would be better to
> to leave
Hi John-Mark,
Maybe it would make more sense to just remove this manual page?
It looks like there are already some pieces of code in our source tree
that use _Static_assert(), which is good. Maybe it would be better to
to leave CTASSERT() undocumented, so that it becomes less likely that
new code
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Bruce Evans wrote this message on Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 16:21 +1000:
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Log:
The implementation note isn't true anymore..
Not that anyone reads it, but those that do, remind them that this
isn't usable i
Bruce Evans wrote this message on Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 16:21 +1000:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> > Log:
> > The implementation note isn't true anymore..
> >
> > Not that anyone reads it, but those that do, remind them that this
> > isn't usable in userland... I can't wait
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Log:
The implementation note isn't true anymore..
Not that anyone reads it, but those that do, remind them that this
isn't usable in userland... I can't wait till this doc is wrong..
It goes without saying that an API documented in a section 9
Author: jmg
Date: Fri Jul 31 03:28:02 2015
New Revision: 286103
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286103
Log:
The implementation note isn't true anymore..
Not that anyone reads it, but those that do, remind them that this
isn't usable in userland... I can't wait till this do
14 matches
Mail list logo
