Adrian Chadd wrote this message on Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:59 -0700:
> On 22 July 2014 10:47, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 22, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >
> >> Wait, which consumers failed that test?
> >
> > geom_vfs I presume, because the file corruption is seen with UFS
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 05:30:06PM +, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Author: marcel
> Date: Tue Jul 22 17:30:05 2014
> New Revision: 268986
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268986
>
> Log:
> In r264504, we prevented doing I/O for more than MAXPHYS by making
> the assumption that
On 22 July 2014 10:47, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>
> On Jul 22, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> Wait, which consumers failed that test?
>
> geom_vfs I presume, because the file corruption is seen with UFS.
Interesting.
I wonder if this is about time we bit the bullet and compiled up G
On Jul 22, 2014, at 10:46 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Wait, which consumers failed that test?
geom_vfs I presume, because the file corruption is seen with UFS.
--
Marcel Moolenaar
mar...@xcllnt.net
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Wait, which consumers failed that test?
-a
On 22 July 2014 10:30, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Author: marcel
> Date: Tue Jul 22 17:30:05 2014
> New Revision: 268986
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268986
>
> Log:
> In r264504, we prevented doing I/O for more than MAXPHYS by mak
Author: marcel
Date: Tue Jul 22 17:30:05 2014
New Revision: 268986
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268986
Log:
In r264504, we prevented doing I/O for more than MAXPHYS by making
the assumption that consumers would respect bio_completed and/or
bio_resid to detect short reads. Th
