Re: svn commit: r254082 - head/sys/net80211

2013-08-08 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, I'm going to eventually nuke OACTIVE. It just doesn't hold any meaning nowdays. Having OACTIVE serialised behind the iflock doesn't actuallly help as much as it used to - because there's multiple concurrent TX path entry points, it's very possible that OACTIVE will get set in one TXing thread

Re: svn commit: r254082 - head/sys/net80211

2013-08-08 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 05:09:36AM +, Adrian Chadd wrote: A> Author: adrian A> Date: Thu Aug 8 05:09:35 2013 A> New Revision: 254082 A> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/254082 A> A> Log: A> Convert net80211 over to using if_transmit for the dispatch from the A> upper layer(s)

svn commit: r254082 - head/sys/net80211

2013-08-07 Thread Adrian Chadd
Author: adrian Date: Thu Aug 8 05:09:35 2013 New Revision: 254082 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/254082 Log: Convert net80211 over to using if_transmit for the dispatch from the upper layer(s). This eliminates the if_snd queue from net80211. Yay! This unfortunately ha