On Tue, 9 Jul 2013, Jim Harris wrote:
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 08:42:49PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[>]* ...
Bruce, until sysexits(3) doesn't explicitly say it shouldn't be used,
please
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 08:42:49PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:44:28AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
>>>
Many style bugs are visible in this patch:
>>
One minor interjection and I'll butt out of the discussion...
In another thread involving Pawel, phk campaigns against errno and asks
for error strings (even if they are only in English). Using perror()
did this long ago for program termination, and using the err() family
does it better
One minor interjection and I'll butt out of the discussion...
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 6, 2013, at 7:26 PM, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 08:42:49PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:44:28AM +1000,
On Sat, 6 Jul 2013, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 08:42:49PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:44:28AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
Many style bugs are visible in this patch:
[...]
- sysexits.h is used
[...]
Bruce, until sysexits(3) doesn't explic
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 09:51:08PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> [...] Firstly, in some application areas like mail delivery, it is
> conventional and documented to use and interpret sysexits codes. (So if
> HAST uses sysexits, it should document that fact.) [...]
The hastd daemon checks for EX_
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 08:42:49PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:44:28AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Many style bugs are visible in this patch:
> [...]
> > - sysexits.h is used
> [...]
> Bruce, until sysexits(3) doesn't explicitly say it shouldn't be used,
> plea
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:44:28AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Many style bugs are visible in this patch:
[...]
> - sysexits.h is used
[...]
Bruce, until sysexits(3) doesn't explicitly say it shouldn't be used,
please stop calling this a bug, because you are just confusing people.
At this point sy
On Thu, 4 Jul 2013, Jim Harris wrote:
Log:
Fix printf argument mismatch reported by gcc on i386.
This just substitutes one printf format with another.
Modified: head/sbin/nvmecontrol/firmware.c
==
--- head/sbin/nvme
On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 12:26:24AM +, Jim Harris wrote:
> Author: jimharris
> Date: Thu Jul 4 00:26:24 2013
> New Revision: 252672
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/252672
>
> Log:
> Fix printf argument mismatch reported by gcc on i386.
>
> Reported by: kargl
>
Thanks.
Author: jimharris
Date: Thu Jul 4 00:26:24 2013
New Revision: 252672
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/252672
Log:
Fix printf argument mismatch reported by gcc on i386.
Reported by: kargl
Modified:
head/sbin/nvmecontrol/firmware.c
Modified: head/sbin/nvmecontrol/firmware.c
11 matches
Mail list logo