On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:24:12AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
A> On 26 April 2013 01:17, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:33:33AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
A> > A> .. is it possible to trigger a remote DoS through mbuf exhaustion
A> > A> somehow by exploiting this?
A> >
A> > Y
On 26 April 2013 01:17, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:33:33AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> A> .. is it possible to trigger a remote DoS through mbuf exhaustion
> A> somehow by exploiting this?
>
> Yes, from a connected network.
Think its worth a full security announcement?
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:33:33AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
A> .. is it possible to trigger a remote DoS through mbuf exhaustion
A> somehow by exploiting this?
Yes, from a connected network.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing
.. is it possible to trigger a remote DoS through mbuf exhaustion
somehow by exploiting this?
Adrian
On 25 April 2013 10:38, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Author: glebius
> Date: Thu Apr 25 17:38:04 2013
> New Revision: 249903
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/249903
>
> Log:
> Fix co
Author: glebius
Date: Thu Apr 25 17:38:04 2013
New Revision: 249903
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/249903
Log:
Fix couple of mbuf leaks in incoming ARP processing.
Modified:
head/sys/netinet/if_ether.c
Modified: head/sys/netinet/if_ether.c
=