On Apr 24, 2013, at 1:49 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 24 Apr 2013, at 03:40, Juli Mallett wrote:
>
>> I don't see why we shouldn't just replace regnum.h with the NetBSD
>> version, and merge that to all active branches. Since you're trying
>> to update these headers, Warner, it would be grea
On 24 Apr 2013, at 03:40, Juli Mallett wrote:
> I don't see why we shouldn't just replace regnum.h with the NetBSD
> version, and merge that to all active branches. Since you're trying
> to update these headers, Warner, it would be great if you could do
> that.
That would probably be sensible.
Also: the comment says that the trapframe layout must match regnum.h —
I don't think that's really true. Why can't we just store things in
the trapframe in whatever order we want? Why do they need to match
the register numbers.
More worrying, however, is that looking at regnum.h brought to my
at
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:38 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> Modified: head/sys/mips/include/frame.h
> ==
> --- head/sys/mips/include/frame.h Tue Apr 23 06:37:50 2013
> (r249789)
> +++ head/sys/mips/include/frame.h
Author: imp
Date: Tue Apr 23 09:38:18 2013
New Revision: 249790
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/249790
Log:
Update trapframe to be consistent with the changes made to regnum.h. This
should fix the booting problems people have been seeing.
Modified:
head/sys/mips/include/frame.