On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:53:35PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
A> Did you also rewview the second patch I sent?
I did. I just don't have anything to comment on it. I guess it is correct,
and you should go forward with it.
However, benchmarking of overall changes to the buf_ring is important.
--
T
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:37:24AM -0800, Attilio Rao wrote:
> A> > Speaking of which, as you are here, I just found out that r241037
> A> > breaks the alignment of the structure.
> A> > Infact the padding member is not updated accordingly.
>
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 08:37:24AM -0800, Attilio Rao wrote:
A> > Speaking of which, as you are here, I just found out that r241037
A> > breaks the alignment of the structure.
A> > Infact the padding member is not updated accordingly.
A> >
A> > We don't have a param to control L2 caches, but I thin
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:55:22AM -0800, Attilio Rao wrote:
A> On
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:55:22AM -0800, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> A> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Gleb Smirnoff
>>> wrote:
>
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:53 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:55:22AM -0800, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> A> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Gleb Smirnoff
>> wrote:
>> A> > Attilio,
>> A> >
>> A> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 1
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:55:22AM -0800, Attilio Rao wrote:
> A> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> A> > Attilio,
> A> >
> A> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:36:58PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
> A> > A> Author: attilio
>
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 04:55:22AM -0800, Attilio Rao wrote:
A> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A> > Attilio,
A> >
A> > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:36:58PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
A> > A> Author: attilio
A> > A> Date: Thu Dec 27 12:36:58 2012
A> > A> New Revision: 244732
A
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:46 AM, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Attilio,
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:36:58PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
> A> Author: attilio
> A> Date: Thu Dec 27 12:36:58 2012
> A> New Revision: 244732
> A> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/244732
> A>
> A> Log:
> A> br_
Attilio,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 12:36:58PM +, Attilio Rao wrote:
A> Author: attilio
A> Date: Thu Dec 27 12:36:58 2012
A> New Revision: 244732
A> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/244732
A>
A> Log:
A> br_prod_tail and br_cons_tail members are used as barrier to
A> signal bug
Author: attilio
Date: Thu Dec 27 12:36:58 2012
New Revision: 244732
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/244732
Log:
br_prod_tail and br_cons_tail members are used as barrier to
signal bug_ring ownership. However, instructions can be reordered
around members write leading to stale v
11 matches
Mail list logo