On Sun, 11 Nov 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-11-11 14:07, Bruce Evans wrote:
...
The pessimality of these functions is another problem. C99 only requires
...
- if you compile isnan*(x) calls using gcc _without_ including ,
then you get annoying (and broken) warnings about implicit fu
On 2012-11-11 14:07, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-11-10 22:43, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 09:22:10PM +, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
Author: dim
Date: Sat Nov 10 21:22:10 2012
New Revision: 242879
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org
On Sat, 10 Nov 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2012-11-10 22:43, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 09:22:10PM +, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
Author: dim
Date: Sat Nov 10 21:22:10 2012
New Revision: 242879
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242879
Log:
Only def
On 2012-11-10 22:43, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 09:22:10PM +, Dimitry Andric wrote:
...
Author: dim
Date: Sat Nov 10 21:22:10 2012
New Revision: 242879
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242879
Log:
Only define isnan, isnanf, __isnan and __isnanf in li
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 09:22:10PM +, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Author: dim
> Date: Sat Nov 10 21:22:10 2012
> New Revision: 242879
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242879
>
> Log:
> Only define isnan, isnanf, __isnan and __isnanf in libc.so, not in
> libc.a and libc_p.a. In
Author: dim
Date: Sat Nov 10 21:22:10 2012
New Revision: 242879
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242879
Log:
Only define isnan, isnanf, __isnan and __isnanf in libc.so, not in
libc.a and libc_p.a. In addition, define isnan in libm.a and libm_p.a,
but not in libm.so.
This m
