On Mon, 21 May 2012, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:24:36 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (18/05/2012 09:41), John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 6:01:31 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Author: gleb
Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012
New Revision: 235601
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/chang
On 5/21/12 11:27 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:24:36 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
On (18/05/2012 09:41), John Baldwin wrote:
A question about your stat changes: did you expand dev_t to 32 bits
for the AFS folks, or did you leave it as 16 bits?
dev_t is already 32-bit.
On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:24:36 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> On (18/05/2012 09:41), John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, May 18, 2012 6:01:31 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> > > Author: gleb
> > > Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012
> > > New Revision: 235601
> > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235601
On (18/05/2012 09:41), John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, May 18, 2012 6:01:31 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> > Author: gleb
> > Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012
> > New Revision: 235601
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235601
> >
> > Log:
> > Don't use ino_t in dumprestore protocol definiti
On Friday, May 18, 2012 6:01:31 am Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> Author: gleb
> Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012
> New Revision: 235601
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235601
>
> Log:
> Don't use ino_t in dumprestore protocol definition.
>
> Since ino_t size is about to change to 64-bits
Author: gleb
Date: Fri May 18 10:01:31 2012
New Revision: 235601
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/235601
Log:
Don't use ino_t in dumprestore protocol definition.
Since ino_t size is about to change to 64-bits, replace ino_t used in
dump protocol definition with 32-bit dump_ino_t
