On Saturday 17 March 2012 12:48:17 Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> On 3/16/12 12:42 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
>>> int32_t en_sw; /* status word (16bits) */
>>
>> what's wrong with this picture?
>
> Only the excessive indentation in the new v
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/16/12 12:42 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
int32_t en_sw; /* status word (16bits) */
what's wrong with this picture?
Only the excessive indentation in the new version.
The 16 in the comment is not mismatched with 32 in the code,
On 3/16/12 12:42 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote:
int32_t en_sw; /* status word (16bits) */
what's wrong with this picture?
___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send
Author: tijl
Date: Fri Mar 16 19:42:39 2012
New Revision: 233043
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/233043
Log:
Use exact width integer types instead of long in struct env87 in
preparation to merge with amd64.
Reviewed by: kib
Modified:
head/sys/i386/include/npx.h
Modified: h