On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:11:39 +0300 Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
JH> On 2012-01-23, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>> I see two issues with this patch:
JH> What do you think about this patch?
I think it is much better than we have currently :-).
JH> %%%
JH> Index: sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs.h
JH> ===
On 2012-01-23, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> I see two issues with this patch:
What do you think about this patch?
%%%
Index: sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs.h
===
--- sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs.h(revision 234201)
+++ sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs.h(workin
On 2012-01-23, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> JH> Yes, the patch below does that. I suspect that flipping the MNT_RDONLY
> JH> flag may be enough for tmpfs but I am not sure.
>
> I see two issues with this patch:
>
> 1) 'mount -u -o rw /mnt' does not upgrade to rw, although it returns success.
Argh, t
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:05:42PM +0200, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:34:57 +0200 Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
>
> JH> On 2012-01-22, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >> Also, may be we should allow remounting ro (and may be some othe options)
> for
> >> tmpfs?
>
> JH> Yes, the patch be
On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:34:57 +0200 Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
JH> On 2012-01-22, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>> Also, may be we should allow remounting ro (and may be some othe options)
>> for
>> tmpfs?
JH> Yes, the patch below does that. I suspect that flipping the MNT_RDONLY
JH> flag may be enough
On 2012-01-22, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> Also, may be we should allow remounting ro (and may be some othe options) for
> tmpfs?
Yes, the patch below does that. I suspect that flipping the MNT_RDONLY
flag may be enough for tmpfs but I am not sure.
> JH> %%%
> JH> Index: sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vfsops.c
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:42:18 +0200 Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
JH> Hi,
JH> On 2012-01-22, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>> JH> # mount -u -o ro /mnt
>> JH> mount: tmpfs : Operation not supported
>> JH> # mount -u -o ro,export /mnt
>> JH> #
>>
>> There is no error but ro is still ignored, so this
Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Jaakko,
> On 2012-01-22, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> > JH> # mount -u -o ro /mnt
> > JH> mount: tmpfs : Operation not supported
> > JH> # mount -u -o ro,export /mnt
> > JH> #
> >
> > There is no error but ro is still ignored, so this is only the issue with
> > repo
Hi,
On 2012-01-22, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> JH> # mount -u -o ro /mnt
> JH> mount: tmpfs : Operation not supported
> JH> # mount -u -o ro,export /mnt
> JH> #
>
> There is no error but ro is still ignored, so this is only the issue with
> reporting. Note, the code for nullfs (as an example) loo
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 19:10:31 +0200 Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
JH> On 2012-01-17, Kevin Lo wrote:
>> Return EOPNOTSUPP since we only support update mounts for NFS export.
>>
>> @@ -150,8 +150,12 @@ tmpfs_mount(struct mount *mp)
>> return (EINVAL);
>>
>> if (mp->
On 2012-01-17, Kevin Lo wrote:
> Return EOPNOTSUPP since we only support update mounts for NFS export.
>
> @@ -150,8 +150,12 @@ tmpfs_mount(struct mount *mp)
> return (EINVAL);
>
> if (mp->mnt_flag & MNT_UPDATE) {
> + /*
> + * Only support update
Author: kevlo
Date: Tue Jan 17 01:25:53 2012
New Revision: 230252
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230252
Log:
Return EOPNOTSUPP since we only support update mounts for NFS export.
Spotted by: trociny
Modified:
head/sys/fs/tmpfs/tmpfs_vfsops.c
Modified: head/sys/fs/tmpfs/tmp
12 matches
Mail list logo
