On 10. Oct 2011, at 08:44 , Qing Li wrote:
Hey,
> Okay, now I know what's confusing you ... it's that bug I introduced :-)
>
> The 2nd "if()" check on the RTF_GATEWAY flag should have been
> an "else if()".
>
> In a nutshell, the logic is any indirect route should fail the check,
> except for t
Okay, now I know what's confusing you ... it's that bug I introduced :-)
The 2nd "if()" check on the RTF_GATEWAY flag should have been
an "else if()".
In a nutshell, the logic is any indirect route should fail the check,
except for that special host route.
Attached is the rework of that part of
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:11:56PM -0700, Qing Li wrote:
Q> > What confuses me most, is that in lines 1435-1445 you are
Q> > assigning error to a positive value, BUT proceeding further
Q> > with function.
Q>
Q>This is what was there before (meaning returning error immediately),
Q>but I gu
Hi Gleb,
>
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 07:51:19PM +, Qing Li wrote:
> Q> Author: qingli
> Q> Date: Mon Oct 3 19:51:18 2011
> Q> New Revision: 225947
> Q> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225947
> Q>
> Q> Log:
> Q> A system may have multiple physical interfaces, all of which are on t
Qing,
[cced Bjoern as reviewer]
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 07:51:19PM +, Qing Li wrote:
Q> Author: qingli
Q> Date: Mon Oct 3 19:51:18 2011
Q> New Revision: 225947
Q> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225947
Q>
Q> Log:
Q> A system may have multiple physical interfaces, all of whi
Author: qingli
Date: Mon Oct 3 19:51:18 2011
New Revision: 225947
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225947
Log:
A system may have multiple physical interfaces, all of which are on the
same prefix. Since a single route entry is installed for the prefix
(without RADIX_MPATH), incomin
