On 16 March 2011 21:37, Ivan Voras wrote:
> For now, there's a report (which actually inspired me to retest and
> commit this) from someone who tried this on 2x 15k RPM SAS drives,
> with much better results using read_max=128 (thread "gmirror
> performance" on freebsd-fs@). I estimate that becau
On 16 March 2011 20:59, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> On 16 March 2011 18:46, Roman Divacky wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:22:59PM +, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> > Author: ivoras
>>> > Date: Wed Mar 16 16:22:59 2011
>>> > New Revision: 21
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 16 March 2011 18:46, Roman Divacky wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:22:59PM +, Ivan Voras wrote:
>> > Author: ivoras
>> > Date: Wed Mar 16 16:22:59 2011
>> > New Revision: 219699
>> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/21
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 20:51:17 +0100
Ivan Voras wrote:
> (Are there any ready read
> multi-stream read tests which are not trivial i.e. they start from
> different positions in the file?)
I think sysutils/fio can do that.
--
Bruce Cran
___
svn-src-all@
On 16 March 2011 18:46, Roman Divacky wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:22:59PM +, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > Author: ivoras
> > Date: Wed Mar 16 16:22:59 2011
> > New Revision: 219699
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219699
> >
> > Log:
> > The hardware has caught up; improveme
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 04:22:59PM +, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Author: ivoras
> Date: Wed Mar 16 16:22:59 2011
> New Revision: 219699
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219699
>
> Log:
> The hardware has caught up; improvements are now observed even at 128,
> but stay conservative and
Author: ivoras
Date: Wed Mar 16 16:22:59 2011
New Revision: 219699
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219699
Log:
The hardware has caught up; improvements are now observed even at 128,
but stay conservative and bump read_max to "only" 64 (it will probably be
a good idea to increase t
