On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:10:18AM +1030, Benjamin Close wrote:
> Is this really the same thing?
> I believe the variable:number is a bitfield indicator not a member
> initialization.
If it had been a declaration of a type, yes. That is not the case
here, which is a declaration/definition of a
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Benjamin Close
wrote:
> Is this really the same thing?
> I believe the variable:number is a bitfield indicator not a member
> initialization.
Indeed it is, in a struct declaration, but that was was an
initialization (notice the equal sign before the brace). That
Is this really the same thing?
I believe the variable:number is a bitfield indicator not a member
initialization.
On 20/11/10 23:54, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Author: bschmidt
Date: Sat Nov 20 13:24:05 2010
New Revision: 215563
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/215563
Log:
MFC r209
Author: bschmidt
Date: Sat Nov 20 13:24:05 2010
New Revision: 215563
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/215563
Log:
MFC r209092:
Remove GNU-style struct initialization.
Committed by: ed
Modified:
stable/8/sys/net80211/ieee80211_rssadapt.c
Directory Properties:
stable/8/sys/
