On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 08:41:22PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Then, fid_reserved is no more reserved ? Should we rename it ?
> >
> > Comment for fid_reserved about longword alignment is wrong.
>
> Well, it's actually more broken than that.
> fid_len - Most file systems set it to the size of t
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
>> Then, fid_reserved is no more reserved ? Should we rename it ?
>>
>> Comment for fid_reserved about longword alignment is wrong.
>
> Well, it's actually more broken than that.
> fid_len - Most file systems set it to the size of their variant
> Then, fid_reserved is no more reserved ? Should we rename it ?
>
> Comment for fid_reserved about longword alignment is wrong.
Well, it's actually more broken than that.
fid_len - Most file systems set it to the size of their variant
of the entire structure, including the Xfid_len fie
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:18:45PM +, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Author: rmacklem
> Date: Fri Sep 10 23:18:45 2010
> New Revision: 212439
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/212439
>
> Log:
> Fix the NFSVNO_CMPFH() macro in the experimental NFS server so
> that it works correctly for Z
Author: rmacklem
Date: Fri Sep 10 23:18:45 2010
New Revision: 212439
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/212439
Log:
Fix the NFSVNO_CMPFH() macro in the experimental NFS server so
that it works correctly for ZFS file handles. It is possible to
have two ZFS file handles that differ onl
