Re: svn commit: r205487 - head/sys/vm

2010-03-23 Thread K. Macy
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 6:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 23 March 2010 6:33:51 am K. Macy wrote: >> The size change causes the initialization path to change in a way that >> currently causes crashes. > > Are you planning on debugging it further?  Does UMA_BOOTPAGES or NKPT need to > be la

Re: svn commit: r205487 - head/sys/vm

2010-03-23 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 6:33:51 am K. Macy wrote: > The size change causes the initialization path to change in a way that > currently causes crashes. Are you planning on debugging it further? Does UMA_BOOTPAGES or NKPT need to be larger? > On Mar 23, 2010 2:57 AM, "Ivan Voras" wrote: > > On

Re: svn commit: r205487 - head/sys/vm

2010-03-23 Thread K. Macy
The size change causes the initialization path to change in a way that currently causes crashes. On Mar 23, 2010 2:57 AM, "Ivan Voras" wrote: On 22 March 2010 23:39, Kip Macy wrote: > Author: kmacy > Date: Mon Mar 22 22:39... Does this mean you have determined that aligning these structures is

Re: svn commit: r205487 - head/sys/vm

2010-03-23 Thread Ivan Voras
On 22 March 2010 23:39, Kip Macy wrote: > Author: kmacy > Date: Mon Mar 22 22:39:32 2010 > New Revision: 205487 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205487 > > Log: >  - enable alignment on amd64 only Does this mean you have determined that aligning these structures is not as beneficial o

svn commit: r205487 - head/sys/vm

2010-03-22 Thread Kip Macy
Author: kmacy Date: Mon Mar 22 22:39:32 2010 New Revision: 205487 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205487 Log: - enable alignment on amd64 only - only align pcpu caches and the volatile portion of uma_zone Modified: head/sys/vm/uma_int.h Modified: head/sys/vm/uma_int.h ==