Doug Barton a écrit :
I agree to making the change you suggested, but I would like to
quibble over the format. Isn't the attached patch equivalent, and
simpler? What is the value of setting HOME and PATH in the environment
if we're just going to use 'env -i HOME PATH' anyway?
how about to repl
Cyrille Lefevre a écrit :
Doug Barton a écrit :
I agree to making the change you suggested, but I would like to
quibble over the format. Isn't the attached patch equivalent, and
simpler? What is the value of setting HOME and PATH in the environment
if we're just going to use 'env -i HOME PATH'
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20091220183519.gb64...@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
> Brooks Davis writes:
> : This is where the value of service(8) would lie for me. The ability
> : to not have things work by accident due to my environment and then break
> : at
Ed Schouten wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Even though I think having a help-feature is nice, just expecting users
> to open up the proper manual page seems to be our tradition. Because of
> that, I think we should change the usage-output to conform a bit more
> with other applications.
Sorry, I don't agree.
* Ed Schouten wrote:
> while getopts 'ehlrv' COMMAND_LINE_ARGUMENT ; do
^
Should be removed here as well, of course.
--
Ed Schouten
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgpQlwdgVUV9q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Doug,
Even though I think having a help-feature is nice, just expecting users
to open up the proper manual page seems to be our tradition. Because of
that, I think we should change the usage-output to conform a bit more
with other applications. We should also display "-l | -r" instead of
"-l|r".
In message: <20091220183519.gb64...@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
Brooks Davis writes:
: On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 06:31:56PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
: > Hi,
: >
: > > On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:30:41 -0800
: > > Doug Barton said:
: >
: > > About the value this change, I think it s
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:10:55 -0800
>> Doug Barton said:
>
> dougb> I agree to making the change you suggested, but I would like to
> dougb> quibble over the format. Isn't the attached patch equivalent, and
> dougb> simpler? What is the value of setting HOME and PA
Hi,
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 12:10:55 -0800
> Doug Barton said:
dougb> I agree to making the change you suggested, but I would like to
dougb> quibble over the format. Isn't the attached patch equivalent, and
dougb> simpler? What is the value of setting HOME and PATH in the environment
dougb
Robert Watson wrote:
> With Apple's launchd, service descriptions can include user credentials
> that will be set before the service is started. Being able to do that
> here as well would be great, especially in a future where part of our
> supplemental user credential will be additional system pr
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Yup, I often do restart the services installed from ports, too.
> I meant that I don't want that the values of user environment are
> inherited to the services which is started from the user environment.
And I meant that I see the ability to start services AND inherit the
u
Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
>> +exec env -i HOME=$HOME PATH=$PATH $dir/$script $*
>> fi
>> done
>
> The $* should be changed to "$@" here, to avoid inappropriate IFS
> splitting. (Even though rc.subr is broken in this way as well.)
In concept I agree with you, however I want to remai
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, Brooks Davis wrote:
About the value this change, I think it should be same as the values at
boot time. I cannot imagine that someone want to restart the system
daemons under the user environment.
dougb> I can actually, especially for ports.
Yup, I often do restart the s
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 06:31:56PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:30:41 -0800
> > Doug Barton said:
>
> > About the value this change, I think it should be same as the values
> > at boot time. I cannot imagine that someone want to restart the
> > system
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 11:30:41PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> Index: usr.sbin/service/service.sh
> diff -u usr.sbin/service/service.sh.orig usr.sbin/service/service.sh
> --- usr.sbin/service/service.sh.orig 2009-12-20 13:14:14.0 +0900
> +++ usr.sbin/service/service.sh 2009-12-20 13:
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 06:31:56PM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:30:41 -0800
> > Doug Barton said:
>
> > About the value this change, I think it should be same as the values
> > at boot time. I cannot imagine that someone want to restart the
> > system
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:31:56 +0900
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > About the value this change, I think it should be same as the values
> > at boot time. I cannot imagine that someone want to restart the
> > system daemons under the user environment.
> dougb> I can actually, especially for ports.
> Yu
Hi,
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:30:41 -0800
> Doug Barton said:
> About the value this change, I think it should be same as the values
> at boot time. I cannot imagine that someone want to restart the
> system daemons under the user environment.
dougb> I can actually, especially for port
Good day!
20.12.2009 04:34, Doug Barton пишет:
Author: dougb
Date: Sun Dec 20 01:34:12 2009
New Revision: 200743
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/200743
Log:
The service command is an easy interface to the rc.d system.
Its primary purpose is to start and stop services provided b
I've reattached your original patch and included the freebsd-rc list.
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:51:13 -0800
>> Doug Barton said:
>
> dougb> Other than the removal of "exit $?" I'm not necessarily opposed to
> dougb> that idea, but I'm wondering what value t
Hi,
> On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:51:13 -0800
> Doug Barton said:
dougb> Other than the removal of "exit $?" I'm not necessarily opposed to
dougb> that idea, but I'm wondering what value this change would have in the
dougb> "system is already up and running" case (when it will be executed) vs
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> I believe this addition is useful.
Thanks. :)
> I'm using similar script locally.
> However, we should consider the environment variables and the current
> directory, IMO. Could you include the attached patch?
Other than the removal of "exit $?" I'm not necessarily oppos
Hi,
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 01:34:12 + (UTC)
> Doug Barton said:
dougb> Author: dougb
dougb> Date: Sun Dec 20 01:34:12 2009
dougb> New Revision: 200743
dougb> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/200743
dougb> Log:
dougb> The service command is an easy interface to the rc.d sy
Author: dougb
Date: Sun Dec 20 01:34:12 2009
New Revision: 200743
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/200743
Log:
The service command is an easy interface to the rc.d system.
Its primary purpose is to start and stop services provided by
the rc.d scripts, however it can also be used to
24 matches
Mail list logo
