Re: svn commit: r195029 - head/etc

Doug Barton wrote: Sam Leffler wrote: Using device names is a bad idea. Take a look at wpa_supplicant (for example) for how to check the media status to determine whether a device is wireless. I agree that it's not optimal, and I would prefer a dynamic solution as opposed to a static

Re: svn commit: r195029 - head/etc

Sam Leffler wrote: > Using device names is a bad idea. Take a look at wpa_supplicant (for > example) for how to check the media status to determine whether a device > is wireless. I agree that it's not optimal, and I would prefer a dynamic solution as opposed to a static one. What mechanism would

Re: svn commit: r195029 - head/etc

Doug Barton wrote: Author: dougb Date: Fri Jun 26 01:27:16 2009 New Revision: 195029 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195029 Log: rtsol should not be run on the wireless NIC interfaces directly, it will run on wlan0 instead. Modified: head/etc/network.subr Modified: head/etc/ne

svn commit: r195029 - head/etc

Author: dougb Date: Fri Jun 26 01:27:16 2009 New Revision: 195029 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/195029 Log: rtsol should not be run on the wireless NIC interfaces directly, it will run on wlan0 instead. Modified: head/etc/network.subr Modified: head/etc/network.subr ==