2009/5/29 Edward Tomasz Napierala :
> u_int mnt_flag; /* (i) flags shared with user
> */
> + u_int mnt_xflag; /* (i) more flags shared with
> user */
I have a trivial question, it probably has to do more with style than
with technical
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Attilio Rao wrote:
2009/5/29 Scott Long :
Occasionally it's useful to be able to run older binaries on newer kernels.
One particularly useful place is for making releases. Does this change to
struct mount break that? If so, could there be any other way to achieve
what
On 0529T0948, Scott Long wrote:
> Occasionally it's useful to be able to run older binaries on newer
> kernels.
Yes, not being able to use mount(8) from FreeBSD 7 on a kernel from
FreeBSD 8 would suck. ;-)
> One particularly useful place is for making releases. Does
> this change to struct mou
2009/5/29 Scott Long :
> Occasionally it's useful to be able to run older binaries on newer kernels.
> One particularly useful place is for making releases. Does
> this change to struct mount break that? If so, could there be any other
> way to achieve what you want without the breakage?
The st
Occasionally it's useful to be able to run older binaries on newer
kernels. One particularly useful place is for making releases. Does
this change to struct mount break that? If so, could there be any other
way to achieve what you want without the breakage?
Scott
Edward Tomasz Napierala wro
Author: trasz
Date: Fri May 29 15:00:04 2009
New Revision: 193041
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/193041
Log:
There is only one spare MNT_ flag left, and I want to use it for NFSv4 ACLs.
Make room for additional filesystem flags now, to avoid breaking ABI later.
Reviewed by: k
