On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Bruce Evans wrote:
Testing processes blocked in sleep(100) shows some bugs in truss(1):
...
- under -current, truss with -p is broken. It now aborts the nanosleep()
immediately with EINTR. ktrace with -p still works correctly.
This seems to be because truss now uses ptr
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <20090430110739.682cc989.s...@freebsd.org>
Stanislav Sedov writes:
: On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:36:38 +1000 (EST)
: Bruce Evans mentioned:
:
: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Warner Losh wrote:
: >
: > > Log:
: > > Report the next directory
In message: <20090430110739.682cc989.s...@freebsd.org>
Stanislav Sedov writes:
: On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:36:38 +1000 (EST)
: Bruce Evans mentioned:
:
: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Warner Losh wrote:
: >
: > > Log:
: > > Report the next directory being scanned when a ^T is pressed (or any
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:36:38 +1000 (EST)
Bruce Evans mentioned:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > Log:
> > Report the next directory being scanned when a ^T is pressed (or any
> > SIGINFO). Provides some progress report for the impatient.
>
> The impatient should use a tracing
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Warner Losh wrote:
Log:
Report the next directory being scanned when a ^T is pressed (or any
SIGINFO). Provides some progress report for the impatient.
The impatient should use a tracing utility instead of encrufting
individual utilities.
This
won't report that we'r
Author: imp
Date: Thu Apr 30 01:24:53 2009
New Revision: 191677
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/191677
Log:
Report the next directory being scanned when a ^T is pressed (or any
SIGINFO). Provides some progress report for the impatient. This
won't report that we're blocking in ou
