On Thursday 23 April 2009 7:55:53 am Robert Watson wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > Adjust the way we number CPUs on x86 so that we attempt to "group" all
> > logical CPUs in a package. We do this by numbering the non-boot CPUs
> > by starting with the first CPU whose AP
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 6:30:12 pm Ivan Voras wrote:
> 2009/4/22 John Baldwin :
> > On Wednesday 22 April 2009 5:40:37 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Author: jhb
> >> Date: Wed Apr 22 21:40:37 2009
> >> New Revision: 191405
> >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/191405
> >>
> >> Log:
> >>
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 6:03:04 pm Ceri Davies wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 05:59:04PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 April 2009 5:40:37 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> > > Author: jhb
> > > Date: Wed Apr 22 21:40:37 2009
> > > New Revision: 191405
> > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/
2009/4/23 Robert Watson :
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
>> 2009/4/23 Robert Watson :
>>
>>> Do you have any ideas about ways to usefully represent and manage
>>> concepts like "pick a close CPU" or "the set of CPUs that are close"? For
>>> example, if I have available a flow identif
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Ivan Voras wrote:
2009/4/23 Robert Watson :
Do you have any ideas about ways to usefully represent and manage concepts
like "pick a close CPU" or "the set of CPUs that are close"? For example,
if I have available a flow identifier, hashing to one of a set of available
2009/4/23 Robert Watson :
> Do you have any ideas about ways to usefully represent and manage concepts
> like "pick a close CPU" or "the set of CPUs that are close"? For example,
> if I have available a flow identifier, hashing to one of a set of available
> CPUs is easy, but what would you sugge
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, John Baldwin wrote:
Adjust the way we number CPUs on x86 so that we attempt to "group" all
logical CPUs in a package. We do this by numbering the non-boot CPUs
by starting with the first CPU whose APIC ID is after the boot CPU and
wrapping back around to APIC ID 0 if ne
2009/4/22 John Baldwin :
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 5:40:37 pm John Baldwin wrote:
>> Author: jhb
>> Date: Wed Apr 22 21:40:37 2009
>> New Revision: 191405
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/191405
>>
>> Log:
>> Adjust the way we number CPUs on x86 so that we attempt to "group" all
>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 05:59:04PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009 5:40:37 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> > Author: jhb
> > Date: Wed Apr 22 21:40:37 2009
> > New Revision: 191405
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/191405
> >
> > Log:
> > Adjust the way we number CP
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 5:40:37 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> Author: jhb
> Date: Wed Apr 22 21:40:37 2009
> New Revision: 191405
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/191405
>
> Log:
> Adjust the way we number CPUs on x86 so that we attempt to "group" all
> logical CPUs in a package. We
Author: jhb
Date: Wed Apr 22 21:40:37 2009
New Revision: 191405
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/191405
Log:
Adjust the way we number CPUs on x86 so that we attempt to "group" all
logical CPUs in a package. We do this by numbering the non-boot CPUs
by starting with the first CPU w
11 matches
Mail list logo
