On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 09:38:56 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:51:04PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > I don't really know if we need to increase the delays or not. I have no
> > idea
> > what Intel's source for those numbers in the two documents are. I don't
> >
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:51:04PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> Also, I believe that the 100 millisecond timer referred to in step 14 above is
> a timeout on the entire AP-enumeration process and is the timer waited for in
> step 16. It also seems that the BIOS uses broadcast (all-but-self) IPIs,
On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 03:38:50 AM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> But apparently, that did not helped, and it seems that there are
> sporadic reports of Linux having similar issues with x2APIC on similar
> mobile SandyBridge, which are proof-less charged to BIOS bugs.
>
> Mostly, my question is,
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 08:13:23PM +, John Baldwin wrote:
> Author: jhb
> Date: Mon Mar 30 20:13:22 2015
> New Revision: 280866
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/280866
>
> Log:
> Wait 100 microseconds for a local APIC to dispatch each startup-related IPI
> rather than 20.
